Friday 23 August 2013

At Sixes or Sevens

That we won our Silver Plate match against Anne Catchpole's team - Anne is the sister of Cambridge's Paul Fegarty - is due to a little luck and some solid declarer play by Victor Milman.

There was a little banter at the tea break regarding this slam deal which occurred in the first set.

In my room the contract was 6 by West and the lead was Q. How would you plan the play?



AQ54

KJ83
AK1064

9
A6

KJ5
A6

K10754



Our table's auction was:


West
North
East
South
2 (1)
Pass
2 (2)
Pass
2NT (3)
Pass
3 (4)
Pass
3 (5)
Pass
3 (6)
Pass
3
Pass
4NT (7)
Pass
5 (8)
Pass
6
All Pass


(1) Benjimanised - showing various kinds of strong hand
(2) Forced
(3) Showing (ostensibly) 23-24 balanced
(4) Asking for majors
(5) Showing at lest one four card (or longer) major
(6) Showing spades
(7) Roman Key Card Blackwood
(8) Four keycards or one.

As dummy went down, Paul Lamford who was declarer said to his partner "Not tempted to try for seven?" Dummy muttered something about needing precise cards and then trailed off.

Paul won the opening lead in hand, ruffed a small heart on table and then cashed dummy's KJ, both opponents following. A club to hand was followed by a second heart ruff with dummy's last trump - revealing the hearts to have started 4-3. Declarer now simply returned to hand with A, drew the last trump and cashed his two heart winners and the minor suit kings for thirteen tricks.

As he took the last trick, Paul looked sternly at dummy, who quivered slightly.

This is undoubtedly a solid line of play at pairs where over tricks matter, but is it the best line in a small slam?

Hearts breaking 4-3 is a 62% chance and there are several additional chances even if they break 5-2 (assuming that spades break reasonably). One would be really unlucky to go down......

Victor Milman at the other table was also in 6 but this time played by East on Q opening lead. Winning in dummy with the ace, he cashed A, both opponents following, and continued with Q. When trumps broke, he cashed K and ruffed a club. In fact South had four clubs but also had the last trump, so dummy won this trick. Victor crossed back to his K and ruffed another round of clubs successfully (establishing dummy' last club in the process). He followed with AK, discarding the J, ruffed a heart with his J, drew the outstanding trump and claimed.

On this line of play, even if the third round of clubs had been over-ruffed, there was no way of preventing that ruff of the fourth round of clubs and establishing the suit for twelve tricks.

Now of course, there are distributions where Paul's line works better (notably in certain cases where clubs break worse than 4-2, and spades break 4-1) - but clubs breaking 3-3 or 4-2 is an 84% chance.

All much of a muchness, you may think - but Victor's line also seems to me have clear advantages if the spades prove to be 5-0 and the hearts 5-2 - certainly if the spade length is with South. Cashing the A at trick two gives you more options of playing on cross-ruff lines if the bad break is revealed early, while ruffing a heart may prejudice your options.

Imagine the full deal had been:





None


QJ852


10973


QJ82

AQ54

KJ83
AK1064

9
A6

KJ5
A6

K10754

109762


73


Q842


93

 



After winning the opening lead with K, you cash the A and receive the bad news, North throwing a diamond. You next cash the three other aces in your hand (in true palooka fashion), discarding dummy's J  - you are going to establish dummy's fifth club to play through South, so you must under no circumstances throw a club! You now follow with a club to dummy's king and a third round of clubs. What is South to do? Wriggle as he may, he cannot stop you from making five tricks from your remaining seven trumps. Say he discards a diamond, declarer ruffs and plays a diamond back to table; a fourth round of clubs follows. If he discards once more, declarer can again ruff small and take three top trumps. If South ruffs in, declarer overruffs with Q, crosses back to table with a trump and cashes his now established fifth club. South can at last make a trump trick - but it is the last one for his side, and the slam makes.

Epilog

Thre are a lot of permutations on this deal - on most normal distributions of the opposing cards, the contract will make with either line. For the less usual distributions, sometimes it works better to winthe first trump trick in the East hand , sometimes in West. I'll let the reader judge.......









 











2 comments:

  1. It looks like an improvement on Victor's line might be to only cash one top trump. Then if the ace and king of clubs stand up you are 100% by ruffing a club high, crossing back in trumps and ruffing the fourth club low. The problem with cashing both AQ of trumps is if North has four spades and two clubs.

    I wonder whether it may be even better not to play any trumps at all, but start on clubs immediately. This might lose when spades are 5-0 but you're retaining some options in case of a 5-1 club break. Too complicated for me to work this out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cashing one top trump and then playing on clubs as you suggest is a nice improvement, David - why didn't I spot that?

      Delete